← Back to Articles 📊 See complete comparison of all 5 AI notetakers →

Avoma vs Basil: Individual vs Enterprise AI Meeting Solutions

Published October 23, 2025 • 7 min read

Avoma and Basil serve very different users. Avoma is an enterprise conversation intelligence platform for sales teams. Basil is a privacy-first individual solution. Here's how to choose between them.

Basil AI Overview

On-Device Processing: Transcription and summaries generated entirely on your iPhone/Mac
Privacy-First: No cloud uploads, no account required
Individual Focus: Designed for solo professionals and small teams
Pricing: $99/year for unlimited transcription

Avoma: Enterprise Conversation Intelligence

G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (1,300+ reviews)

Avoma is an all-in-one platform that not only transcribes meetings but also analyzes them to help improve team performance.

Key Features

Automatic transcription and summarization
Conversation intelligence: Talk-to-listen ratios, keyword tracking, competitor mentions
Sentiment analysis of calls
CRM data filling (Salesforce, HubSpot)
Analytics dashboards for coaching
Agenda templates and collaboration tools

Pricing

Professional: ~$19/user/month (annual) – transcription, basic analytics
Business/Enterprise: $40+ user/month – advanced analytics, custom reporting

Avoma's pricing reflects its enterprise focus: $228/year minimum vs Basil's $100/year

The Fundamental Difference

      Different Audiences: Avoma is built for sales teams and enterprises needing conversation analytics. Basil is built for individuals needing simple, private transcription. They barely compete.
    

Avoma's Strengths

Conversation analytics: Track performance metrics across your sales team
Coaching insights: Identify what's working and what's not on calls
CRM integration: Auto-log call details to Salesforce
Team dashboards: See trends across all meetings
Playbooks: Templates for different meeting types

Basil's Advantages

Complete privacy: Data never leaves your device
Simple setup: No account, no onboarding, no calendar connections
Lower cost: $100/year vs $228+ for Avoma
Individual use: Perfect for solo professionals
Offline capable: Works without internet

When to Choose Avoma

Avoma is the right choice if:

You're part of a sales or customer success team
You need conversation analytics and performance tracking
CRM integration is essential for your workflow
You want coaching insights from call data
Budget allows for enterprise software investment

When to Choose Basil

Basil is the right choice if:

You're an individual professional (lawyer, doctor, journalist)
Privacy is non-negotiable (confidential client data)
You need simple transcription without analytics overhead
You work solo or in a small practice
You want straightforward, affordable transcription

      The Bottom Line: Basil competes with Avoma only on basic transcription. For anything beyond that (AI insights, multi-meeting analysis, team analytics), Avoma stands in a different class. Individuals will find Basil sufficient and more secure; larger teams with sales/CS functions may require Avoma's fuller feature set despite higher cost.
    

Conclusion

Choose Avoma if you need enterprise conversation intelligence and can justify the investment.

Choose Basil if you need simple, private transcription at an individual-friendly price.

These tools serve fundamentally different markets. The decision is straightforward: Are you building sales team performance or protecting individual privacy?

📊 Compare Basil with all 5 AI notetakers: Complete Guide →

Simple, Private Transcription for Individuals

No enterprise complexity. No cloud uploads. Just private AI transcription.

Free to try • $99/year for unlimited transcription