← Back to Articles

Basil vs Top 5 AI Meeting Notetaker Apps: Complete 2025 Comparison Guide

Published October 20, 2025 β€’ 20 min read

Choosing an AI meeting notetaker? The market is crowded with options, each promising to save you time and boost productivity. But there's one critical difference that separates them all: privacy.

Basil AI is a privacy-focused AI notetaker and transcriber for iOS (with a web companion) that performs all transcription and summarization on-device. No audio or text is sent to the cloud, which means your meeting data stays private. This makes Basil stand out in the AI meeting assistant space, as most competitors rely on cloud processing.

In this comprehensive guide, we compare Basil with five of the most adopted AI notetaker apps (focused on iOS availability in the USA) – Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, Avoma, MeetGeek, and Notta – covering their features, pricing, user reviews, ease of use, and how each stacks up against Basil.

πŸ“‹ Quick Navigation

Detailed comparisons available:

Basil AI Overview: Private On-Device Notetaker

Before diving into the competitors, here's a brief overview of Basil's key features and unique value:

Key Features

Basil's Unique Value: While competitors focus on cloud-powered features and team collaboration, Basil prioritizes absolute privacy through on-device processing. This makes it the only choice for professionals who cannot risk their meeting data touching external servers.

Basil vs Otter.ai

Otter.ai is often considered the "household name" in AI meeting transcription. It is a cloud-based note-taking service known for live transcription and meeting summaries, widely used for business meetings, lectures, and interviews. Otter has multi-platform support (Web, iOS, Android) and is heavily integrated with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams.

Features & Capabilities

Otter's OtterPilot AI assistant can automatically join virtual meetings (Zoom/Teams/Meet) to record and transcribe them in real time. It generates concise summaries of discussions and can identify speakers and highlight keywords. Otter also automatically captures action items and can even draft follow-up emails or notes from the meeting.

A newer feature, Otter AI Chat, lets users query their past meeting transcripts in natural language (e.g. "What did we decide about budget?") and get answers from the notes. Otter's transcripts are searchable and shareable, and it offers collaboration tools like commenting and editing shared meeting notes.

For sales teams, Otter provides conversation analytics and CRM integrations (syncing notes to Salesforce/HubSpot).

Pricing

Otter's free tier is more generous than Basil's 60 min/month free, while Basil's Pro pricing ($8.33/mo annual) is comparable to Otter's Pro in cost.

User Reviews & Ease of Use

Users often praise Otter for its ease of use and reliable transcription for English. Its interface is clean and intuitive, making it easy to record and review transcripts.

G2 Rating: ~4.4/5 stars (400+ reviews)

Users highlight its accurate speech-to-text and time-saving summaries. Reviewers do note that Otter's summaries, while useful, aren't 100% accurate and may require manual editing for important meetings. One G2 user mentioned: "The summaries are vague and at times give inaccuracies… We find ourselves rewriting notes."

Privacy & Security

As a cloud service, Otter stores meeting data on its servers (not on-device). Otter has implemented security measures like SOC 2 Type II compliance, GDPR/CCPA alignment, and two-factor authentication. Deleted transcripts are auto-removed after 30 days.

Consideration: Otter is not EU-hosted (data likely stored in US). Users must trust Otter's policies that data won't be misused. Audio is uploaded and temporarily stored, which might raise compliance issues in certain fields (legal, medical) unless an enterprise agreement is in place.

Comparison with Basil

Fundamental difference: Cloud vs on-device.

Otter's strengths:

Basil's advantages:

Summary: Otter is a powerful, widely-adopted AI notetaker with robust features, whereas Basil offers a trade-off: fewer integrations but superior privacy by keeping everything local.

β†’ Read the full Otter vs Basil comparison

Basil vs Fireflies.ai

Fireflies.ai is a popular AI meeting assistant known for transcribing and summarizing meetings with a strong focus on integration and collaboration. Fireflies can integrate with major web conferencing platforms and productivity apps, making it a versatile choice for many professionals.

Features & Capabilities

Fireflies works by either joining your online meetings as an automated participant (a bot named "Fred" by default) or by transcribing audio you record/upload. It creates a full transcript of the meeting and then provides AI-generated "Super Summaries" that include key points, an outline of the discussion, and action items.

Key features:

Pricing

Fireflies' annual price ~$120/user/year vs Basil $100/year

User Reviews & Feedback

G2 Rating: 4.8/5 (700+ reviews)

Fireflies is highly regarded for its rich feature set. Users particularly praise its advanced capabilities (action item detection, comprehensive summaries) and ease of use. In expert reviews, Fireflies was picked as "best for advanced features" among AI notetakers.

Privacy & Security

Fireflies is a cloud solution – all recordings and transcripts reside on Fireflies' servers (hosted on AWS). Security features include data encryption, options to restrict meeting attendance to specific domains, and rules for not joining meetings unless invited.

Consideration: By design, Fireflies stores your meeting data (unless you delete it) to enable search and analytics. Organizations concerned about confidentiality might need to sign a BAA or enterprise agreement.

Comparison with Basil

Basil's key advantage: Privacy. With Basil, transcription and summary happen on your iPhone itself, and no meeting audio or text ever leaves your device. Fireflies uploads and stores audio in the cloud.

Basil is also bot-free: You don't add any participant to calls; you either use your phone's mic or the Basil web app to capture audio. More natural and less intrusive than Fireflies' bot approach.

Summary: Use Basil if you require maximum privacy or offline functionality; use Fireflies if you need deep integration with work apps, multi-language support, and collaborative AI note-taking.

β†’ Read the full Fireflies vs Basil comparison

Basil vs Avoma

Avoma is an AI meeting assistant and conversation intelligence platform primarily geared towards business teams (sales, customer success, product meetings). It records and transcribes meetings, but goes further by analyzing conversations to provide insights and coaching.

G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (1,300+ reviews)

Features & Capabilities

Avoma is an all-in-one platform that not only transcribes meetings but also analyzes them to help improve team performance.

Key features:

Pricing

Avoma is a premium service with no fully free tier (aside from trial):

Avoma's pricing reflects its enterprise focus. For individual users: Basil Pro is $99/year vs Avoma ~$240/year minimum

Comparison with Basil

Basil and Avoma serve very different user needs:

Basil: Ideal for individual or small team needing straightforward transcription and summaries with ironclad privacy. For lawyers or doctors working solo, Basil gives simple transcripts without exposing client data.

Avoma: Aimed at organizations wanting to leverage AI to deeply analyze and archive meeting conversations. For sales teams or product teams, provides advanced workflows (talk time tracking, Salesforce auto-update, etc.)

Key differences:

β†’ Read the full Avoma vs Basil comparison

Basil vs MeetGeek

MeetGeek is a newer AI meeting assistant that has gained positive attention for its user-friendly design and high-quality summaries. In some 2025 rankings, MeetGeek was rated as the #1 AI note-taker for its balanced features and usability.

Features & Capabilities

MeetGeek automatically records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings. One standout aspect is its AI-generated meeting notes templates.

Key features:

Pricing

MeetGeek's free 5 hours is more than Basil's free 1 hour. MeetGeek's Pro is pricier than Basil's $9.99 for full functionality.

User Reviews & Ease of Use

G2 Rating: ~4.6/5 (400+ reviews)

MeetGeek has been lauded for its ease of setup and high-quality output. One reviewer said: "MeetGeek offers the best AI meeting summaries I've seen" and provides "superbly structured meeting notes".

Comparison with Basil

Both cater to individuals and professionals, but prioritize differently:

MeetGeek focus: Streamlined meeting productivity – automates the whole workflow of capturing and producing easy-to-read summaries with next steps.

Basil focus: Privacy and simplicity – captures and summarizes, but leaves structure more to the user. All happens on your device.

Summary: Choose Basil when you need offline capability and data security; choose MeetGeek when you want maximum automation and polished meeting minutes for general business use.

β†’ Read the full MeetGeek vs Basil comparison

Basil vs Notta

Notta is an AI-powered transcription and note-taking app that has gained traction especially among individuals, students, and multilingual users. It offers real-time transcription, AI summaries, and even translation features. Notta was featured as an App of the Day by Apple.

Features & Capabilities

Notta's core feature is highly accurate speech-to-text transcription, boasting up to 98.86% accuracy in ideal conditions.

Key features:

Pricing

Basil's paid plan is $99/year for unlimited minutes (English only). Notta's pricing slightly higher for annual plan and caps at 30 hours/month.

User Reviews & Feedback

App Store Rating: 4.0/5 (from ~1,000 ratings)
G2 Rating: ~4.4/5 (200+ reviews)

Pros: Transcription accuracy, translation feature, intuitive interface
Cons: Free tier too restrictive, occasional app bugs

Privacy & Security

Notta is cloud-based – sends audio to servers for processing.

Security: SOC 2 Type II certification, ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certification

Comparison with Basil

Biggest differences: Privacy/offline capability vs. language/features breadth.

Basil hallmark: Privacy: never requires internet or uploading audio. Unrivaled for offline use and confidentiality.

Notta advantages: Multiple languages (Spanish, French, Chinese, etc.), instant translation of transcripts, generous cross-device sync.

When to choose:

β†’ Read the full Notta vs Basil comparison

Conclusion & Decision Guide

AI note-taking for meetings has evolved into a competitive space with many capable apps. In the USA, on iOS devices, the top contenders like Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, Avoma, MeetGeek, and Notta each offer unique strengths – from Otter's well-known reliability to Avoma's deep analytics – but they all rely on cloud processing.

Basil positions itself differently by providing an on-device, privacy-first solution. For individuals, professionals (doctors, lawyers, journalists), or students who value confidentiality and control over their data, Basil offers peace of mind that none of their meeting content is leaving their personal device.

Quick Decision Framework

Tool Privacy Model Best For Price (Annual)
Basil 100% local processing Privacy-conscious individuals $100/year
Otter Cloud with SOC 2 General business users, students $100-200/year
Fireflies Cloud with AWS hosting Teams needing integrations $120/year
Avoma Cloud with enterprise focus Sales teams, conversation analytics $228+/year
MeetGeek Cloud with templates Structured meeting minutes $180/year
Notta Cloud with ISO cert Multilingual users $115/year

Choose Basil if:

Choose cloud alternatives if:

Final Verdict: Basil stands out in a crowded field by addressing a clear gap: privacy and on-device processing in AI note-taking. Each competitor has proven strengths, but Basil sacrifices some cloud-driven extras in exchange for security, simplicity, and control.

Read Detailed Comparisons

Experience Privacy-First AI Transcription

100% on-device processing. No cloud. No data mining. Choose the meeting notetaker that keeps your data in your hands.

Free to try β€’ $99/year for unlimited transcription