Read AI vs Basil: The Privacy-First Alternative

Read.ai has rapidly gained popularity as an AI meeting assistant that goes beyond simple transcription, offering engagement metrics, summaries, and coaching insights. But beneath the impressive feature set lies a familiar trade-off: your meeting data is processed and stored in the cloud. For professionals who handle confidential conversations, that trade-off may be unacceptable.

In this comparison, we take a close look at Read.ai and Basil AI—two AI meeting assistants built on fundamentally different architectures. Read.ai leverages cloud infrastructure to deliver rich analytics. Basil AI processes everything on your device, ensuring your meetings never leave your control. Which approach is right for you?

What Is Read.ai?

Read.ai is a cloud-based AI meeting assistant designed to help professionals get more out of their virtual meetings. Launched as a tool for meeting productivity, it has grown into a comprehensive platform that integrates with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet.

Core Features

• Meeting Summaries: Automatic AI-generated summaries with key topics, decisions, and action items extracted from each meeting
• Engagement Metrics: Real-time scoring of participant engagement, attention levels, and talk-time distribution—a unique differentiator among AI meeting tools
• Action Item Tracking: Automatically detects and tracks follow-up tasks mentioned during conversations
• Meeting Coaching: Provides feedback on meeting habits, helping users improve meeting efficiency over time
• Integrations: Works with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack, and calendar applications
• Cross-Platform: Available as a browser extension, desktop app, and mobile app
• Multi-Language: Supports transcription in multiple languages

Read.ai has attracted attention for its engagement analytics, which go beyond what most AI notetakers offer. The ability to see how engaged participants are during a meeting is a powerful tool for managers and presenters. However, as Wired has reported, the rise of AI meeting bots raises significant questions about workplace surveillance and consent.

Read.ai Privacy Concerns

Like most AI meeting assistants, Read.ai relies on cloud processing to deliver its features. This architecture introduces several privacy considerations that professionals should evaluate carefully.

Cloud-Based Data Processing

Every meeting that Read.ai processes is sent to external servers for transcription, analysis, and summary generation. This means your audio, video engagement data, and transcripts pass through third-party infrastructure. For routine team syncs, this may be acceptable. For sensitive discussions—board meetings, legal consultations, medical conversations, or M&A negotiations—the risk calculus changes significantly.

Data Retention and Storage

Read.ai stores meeting data to power features like historical search, analytics dashboards, and coaching insights. While the platform offers data deletion options, the fundamental model requires retaining meeting content on external servers for the product to function. According to research from TechCrunch, cloud-based meeting AI services routinely retain more data than users realize.

Third-Party Access and AI Training

Cloud-based AI services face ongoing scrutiny about how meeting data is used beyond the immediate service. Questions around whether anonymized or aggregated data is used for model training, shared with partners, or accessible to employees are common across the industry. The GDPR imposes strict requirements on data processing, and organizations operating in regulated industries must verify that their tools comply.

Engagement Monitoring Concerns

Read.ai's engagement scoring—while useful for meeting optimization—raises additional privacy questions. Tracking how attentive participants are during meetings blurs the line between productivity enhancement and workplace surveillance. Employees may not be comfortable knowing their engagement levels are being measured, scored, and potentially shared with managers.

Basil AI: The On-Device Alternative

Basil AI takes a fundamentally different approach to meeting transcription. Instead of sending your audio to the cloud, Basil processes everything locally on your iPhone or Mac using Apple's on-device Speech Recognition framework and Apple's Neural Engine.

How Basil Works Differently

• 100% On-Device Processing: Transcription, summarization, and action item extraction happen entirely on your device. No audio or text data is ever sent to external servers.
• No Account Required: Install the app and start recording immediately. No sign-up, no email, no data collection.
• Works Offline: Full functionality in airplane mode, secure facilities, or areas without internet access. The AI models run locally on Apple's Neural Engine.
• Apple Ecosystem Integration: Save transcripts directly to Apple Notes, use Siri Shortcuts for automation, and leverage iCloud sync between your own devices.
• Voice Commands: Say "Hey Basil" to start recording hands-free.
• 8-Hour Continuous Recording: Extended recording sessions without interruption or cloud upload timeouts.

Basil's architecture means there is no server to breach, no cloud database to subpoena, and no third-party employee who can access your recordings. Your data remains under your complete control, protected by Apple's hardware-level encryption and privacy protections.

Feature Comparison

Here is a side-by-side look at how Read.ai and Basil AI compare across key categories:

Pricing Comparison

Understanding the cost structure of each tool helps in making an informed decision, especially for individual professionals or small teams.

Read.ai Pricing

• Free Plan: Limited meetings per month with basic summaries and engagement scores
• Pro Plan: $19.75/user/month (billed annually) — unlimited meetings, advanced analytics, integrations
• Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing with SSO, admin controls, priority support, and compliance features

Basil AI Pricing

• Free Plan: 60 minutes/month with full on-device transcription and summaries
• Pro Plan: $9.99/month or $99.99/year — unlimited transcription, 8-hour recording, all features

Who Should Choose Basil Over Read.ai?

While Read.ai is a capable tool for general business use, several professional categories will find Basil AI to be the better choice:

Legal Professionals

Attorneys handling sensitive client matters cannot risk having privileged conversations uploaded to third-party servers. Even with Read.ai's security measures, the act of transmitting attorney-client communications to external infrastructure could compromise privilege protections. Basil's on-device processing maintains privilege by design—no data ever leaves the attorney's control. If you work in legal, see our Otter vs Basil comparison for additional context on how cloud transcription affects legal privilege.

Healthcare Providers

HIPAA requires strict controls over Protected Health Information (PHI). While Read.ai may offer enterprise agreements and BAAs for larger organizations, Basil eliminates the need entirely. When audio never leaves the device, there is no third-party risk to manage, no BAA to negotiate, and no data breach notification to worry about.

Executives and Board Members

Board meetings, strategy sessions, and M&A discussions contain information that could move markets if leaked. Read.ai's engagement analytics may be useful for routine meetings, but for high-stakes conversations, the absolute certainty of on-device processing is essential. Basil ensures that sensitive business intelligence stays on your device.

Professionals in Secure Environments

Government contractors, defense professionals, and anyone working in SCIFs or secure facilities often cannot use cloud-connected tools at all. Basil's full offline capability makes it the only viable option in environments where internet access is restricted or prohibited.

Privacy-Conscious Individuals

If you believe that your conversations should remain yours—not stored on a company's servers, not used to train AI models, and not accessible to any third party—Basil aligns with that philosophy. For a broader look at how on-device AI compares to cloud competitors, read our full comparison guide.

When Read.ai Is the Better Choice

Read.ai has genuine strengths that make it the right tool for certain use cases:

• Team meeting optimization: If you need engagement metrics and coaching to improve how your team runs meetings, Read.ai's analytics are unmatched
• Virtual meeting automation: Automatic integration with Zoom, Teams, and Meet means no manual setup
• Cross-platform needs: If your team spans iOS and Android, Read.ai's broader platform support may be necessary
• Meeting culture insights: Understanding talk-time distribution, meeting frequency, and engagement trends across an organization
• Non-sensitive content: For general team syncs, project updates, and training sessions where privacy is not a critical concern

The Verdict

Read.ai and Basil AI represent two distinct philosophies in AI meeting assistance:

Read.ai maximizes insight by leveraging cloud infrastructure to deliver engagement analytics, coaching, and team-wide meeting intelligence. It is a powerful tool for organizations that want to optimize their meeting culture and are comfortable with cloud-based data processing.

Basil AI maximizes privacy by keeping everything on-device. It sacrifices cloud-powered analytics in exchange for absolute certainty that your meeting data is never transmitted, stored, or accessed by any third party. For professionals who handle confidential information, this is not a nice-to-have—it is a requirement.

The decision ultimately comes down to one question: Do you need your meeting assistant to analyze engagement, or do you need it to protect your privacy? If the answer is privacy, Basil AI is your clear choice.

For more comparisons, see how Basil stacks up against Fireflies and Otter.ai.

Keep Your Meetings Private with Basil AI

100% on-device processing. No cloud. No data mining. No privacy risks.

Free to try • 3-day trial for Pro features