← Back to Articles 📊 See complete comparison of all 5 AI notetakers →

Otter vs Basil: Privacy-First Alternative for AI Meeting Notes

Published October 21, 2025 • 8 min read

Otter.ai is the household name in AI meeting transcription. But is it the right choice for privacy-conscious professionals? Let's compare Otter with Basil AI, the on-device alternative that never uploads your meeting data.

Otter.ai is a cloud-based note-taking service known for live transcription and meeting summaries, widely used for business meetings, lectures, and interviews. It has multi-platform support (Web, iOS, Android) and is heavily integrated with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams.

Basil AI takes a fundamentally different approach: 100% on-device processing. Your audio never leaves your iPhone or Mac, ensuring absolute privacy for confidential conversations.

Basil AI Overview

Key Features

Otter.ai: Features & Capabilities

Otter's OtterPilot AI assistant can automatically join virtual meetings (Zoom/Teams/Meet) to record and transcribe them in real time. It generates concise summaries of discussions and can identify speakers and highlight keywords. Otter also automatically captures action items and can even draft follow-up emails or notes from the meeting.

A newer feature, Otter AI Chat, lets users query their past meeting transcripts in natural language (e.g. "What did we decide about budget?") and get answers from the notes. Otter's transcripts are searchable and shareable, and it offers collaboration tools like commenting and editing shared meeting notes.

For sales teams, Otter provides conversation analytics and CRM integrations (syncing notes to Salesforce/HubSpot).

Pricing

Otter's free tier is more generous than Basil's 60 min/month free, while Basil's Pro pricing ($8.33/mo annual) is comparable to Otter's Pro in cost.

User Reviews & Ease of Use

Users often praise Otter for its ease of use and reliable transcription for English. Its interface is clean and intuitive, making it easy to record and review transcripts.

G2 Rating: ~4.4/5 stars (400+ reviews)

Users highlight its accurate speech-to-text and time-saving summaries. Reviewers do note that Otter's summaries, while useful, aren't 100% accurate and may require manual editing for important meetings. One G2 user mentioned: "The summaries are vague and at times give inaccuracies… We find ourselves rewriting notes."

Privacy & Security

As a cloud service, Otter stores meeting data on its servers (not on-device). Otter has implemented security measures like:

Consideration: Otter is not EU-hosted (data likely stored in US). Users must trust Otter's policies that data won't be misused. Audio is uploaded and temporarily stored, which might raise compliance issues in certain fields (legal, medical) unless an enterprise agreement is in place.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Fundamental Difference: Cloud vs on-device. This single architectural decision impacts every aspect of how these tools work.

Otter's Strengths

Basil's Advantages

Trade-offs

What Basil doesn't do:

What Otter requires:

Privacy Deep Dive: Why This Matters

For many professionals, the privacy difference between Otter and Basil is the deciding factor:

Attorney-Client Privilege

Lawyers cannot risk having confidential client discussions uploaded to third-party servers. Even with Otter's SOC 2 compliance, the mere fact that audio leaves the attorney's control could compromise privilege protections. Basil keeps everything on-device, maintaining privilege by design.

HIPAA Compliance

Healthcare providers discussing patient information need absolute certainty that PHI (Protected Health Information) isn't being transmitted to external servers. While Otter can sign BAAs (Business Associate Agreements) for enterprise customers, Basil's on-device processing eliminates the need entirely—no data leaves the device, so no third-party risk exists.

Executive Strategy

Board meetings, M&A discussions, product strategy sessions—these contain information that could move markets if leaked. Basil ensures that sensitive business intelligence stays on your iPhone, not on someone else's cloud infrastructure.

Journalism & Source Protection

Journalists protecting confidential sources cannot afford to have interview recordings stored on third-party servers that might be subject to subpoena. Basil's local-only storage protects source anonymity.

When to Choose Otter

Otter is an excellent choice if:

When to Choose Basil

Basil is the right choice if:

The Bottom Line: Otter is a powerful, widely-adopted AI notetaker with robust features for general business use. Basil offers a trade-off: fewer cloud-based integrations but superior privacy by keeping everything local. For privacy-conscious professionals, Basil's architecture is the only option that truly protects confidential conversations.

Conclusion

Both Otter and Basil are excellent AI meeting notetakers, but they serve different priorities:

Choose Otter if you need maximum features, team collaboration, and don't handle highly sensitive information.

Choose Basil if privacy is paramount and you need absolute certainty that your meeting data stays on your device.

The decision comes down to one question: Can you afford to trust a third party with your meeting data? If the answer is no, Basil is your only option.

📊 Compare Basil with all 5 AI notetakers: Complete Guide →

Try the Privacy-First Alternative to Otter

100% on-device processing. No cloud uploads. No privacy compromises.

Free to try • $99/year for unlimited transcription