← Back to Articles 📊 See complete comparison of all 5 AI notetakers →

Notta vs Basil: Multilingual vs Privacy-First AI Transcription

Published October 25, 2025 • 8 min read

Notta and Basil are perhaps the closest competitors in the AI transcription space—both target individuals (students, journalists, professionals) rather than enterprise teams. But they diverge on a fundamental question: multilingual versatility or absolute privacy? Here's how to choose.

Basil AI Overview

Notta: Multilingual Cloud Transcription

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (200+ reviews)
App Store Rating: 4.0/5 (1,000+ ratings)

Notta is an AI-powered transcription app that has gained traction among individuals, students, and multilingual users. Featured as an Apple App of the Day, Notta offers real-time transcription with impressive language support and translation features.

Key Features

Pricing

Notta Premium: $115/year with 30-hour monthly cap vs Basil Pro: $100/year with unlimited usage

The Fundamental Difference

Closest Competitors, Different Priorities: Both Notta and Basil target individuals needing handy transcription. Notta prioritizes language breadth and cloud-powered features. Basil prioritizes privacy and offline capability. Your primary need determines the winner.

Notta's Strengths

Basil's Advantages

Use Case Analysis

Best for Notta

Best for Basil

Accuracy Comparison

Notta: Claims up to 98.86% accuracy in ideal conditions. Uses powerful cloud-based speech recognition engines. Some users report it's more accurate than Otter for certain accents.

Basil: Leverages Apple's on-device speech engine, known for excellent English accuracy. Works in real-time without latency. Quality comparable to cloud solutions for English, but limited to languages Apple supports on-device.

Verdict: For English transcription, both are excellent. For multilingual needs, Notta is the clear winner. For privacy-first English transcription, Basil is unmatched.

Free Tier Reality Check

Notta Free: 3 minutes per recording is virtually unusable for real meetings or lectures. This is clearly a trial tier designed to push users toward Premium.

Basil Free: 60 minutes per month. While limited, it's actually usable for occasional transcription needs (4-5 short meetings monthly).

Verdict: Basil's free tier is more practical for genuine free usage. Both apps essentially require paid plans for regular use.

Privacy & Security

Notta's Cloud Security

Basil's On-Device Privacy

Privacy Winner: Basil's architecture makes it impossible for data to leak—it never leaves your device. Notta has strong security certifications, but fundamentally requires trusting a third party with your audio.

Summary Generation

Notta: Uses large cloud models for AI summaries. Can provide detailed summaries with key points. Quality benefits from cloud computing power.

Basil: Generates summaries on-device using Apple's foundation models. More concise (shorter bullet lists), but created without any cloud dependency.

Trade-off: Notta's summaries may be more detailed due to larger models. Basil's summaries prioritize privacy over maximum detail but are still highly useful.

When to Choose Notta

Notta is the right choice if:

When to Choose Basil

Basil is the right choice if:

Conclusion

Choose Notta if you need multilingual support, translation features, and cloud convenience, and you're comfortable with cloud processing.

Choose Basil if you need absolute privacy, offline capability, and unlimited English transcription at a lower cost.

These tools are the closest competitors in targeting individual users, but they excel in different dimensions. Notta is unbeatable for multilingual needs. Basil is unmatched for privacy-first transcription.

The decision is straightforward: Do you need multiple languages or maximum privacy?

📊 Compare Basil with all 5 AI notetakers: Complete Guide →

Your Conversations Deserve Privacy

On-device AI transcription. No uploads. No cloud. No compromises.

Free to try • $99/year for unlimited transcription